Calatrava’s Folly
I was shocked to learn that architect Santiago Calatrava was interested in designing our new 35W bridge. His iconic designs are landmarks all over the globe and single-handedly put Milwaukee back on the map. Since the revelation in Tuesday’s Strib, I’ve not heard a word of it, and am left with the impression nobody who matters cares.
Calatrava apparently was involved with one of the construction teams that did not get picked and is now protesting the process by which a builder was chosen (with good cause, from what I read). What’s been so confounding in this whole bridge-replacement process is figuring out what actually is going on and who is driving it. It seems to be proceeding with a life of its own, but the Star Tribune always seems behind the curve.
The bridge’s design is controversial in that it could add cost and perhaps construction time (Calatrava says he could meet the state’s budget and time constraints).
But the sense I get is that this exurban and rural crowd that runs the state could care less about design. They are the Wal-Mart shoppers, the folks who live in massive homes lacking in detail and charm because raw square footage matters more than aesthetics. They are also, I’d suggest, the folks who want to live near “nature” and see the city as alien and place no value in it being beautiful or even pleasant to be in.
It’s hard to tell if Tim Pawlenty is in that camp, but you pretty much know where Carol Molnau stands. I fear the single-issue liberals are staying away from the topic because it doesn’t speak to their base either. (Perhaps if we banned circuses from using the bridge . . . . )
The problem is the rest of the western world and progressive America understands that design matters, and even pays. Architecture-driven tourism is transforming cities, ours included. Wal-Mart and its lowest-common-denominator mentality are on the outs.
I’d guess that Calatrava wants to design our bridge because the tragedy was a global story that resonated with him. (A colleague just back from Italy says the bridge is now what foreigners associate with Minneapolis.) If Minnesota intends to turn its back on this opportunity so politicians can pander to a Luddite base or because the Wal-Mart crowd can’t see the big picture, well, we are more provincial than I could have imagined.
















Recent Comments